Shadid v. Hammond

2013 OK 103, 315 P.3d 1008, 2013 WL 6448851, 2013 Okla. LEXIS 142
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided December 9, 2013·No. No. 112327·Published·Cited by 14 cases

Opinions

ORDER

1 1 Original jurisdiction is assumed. Okla. Const. Art. 7 § 4. The Oklahoma Publishing Company is directed to file a motion requesting access to the referenced court file pursuant to the Open Records Act, 51 0.S8.2011 § 24A.1 et seq. The Honorable Lisa Hammond, or any other assigned judge, is directed to conduct a hearing to determine all pending matters before the court in FD-2004-6310.

T2 DONE BY ORDER OF THE SUPREME COURT IN CONFERENCE THIS 9th DAY OF DECEMBER, 2013.

REIF, V.C.J., KAUGER, WATT, WINCHESTER, TAYLOR (by separate writing), COMBS, GURICH, JJ., concur. COLBERT, C.J., and EDMONDSON (by separate writing), J., concur in part and dissent in part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Shadid v. Hammond, 2013 OK 103, 315 P.3d 1008, 2013 WL 6448851, 2013 Okla. LEXIS 142 (Okla. 2013).

2013 OK 103 (Shadid v. Hammond) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

GOOD v. FARMERS INSURANCE CO.
2023 OK CIV APP 28 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2023)
BULARD AIR SERVICES v. BROWN AVIATION
2019 OK CIV APP 39 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2019)
OBER v. STATE ex rel. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC SAFETY
2016 OK CIV APP 2 (Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma, 2015)