Sevag Chalian v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc

CourtDistrict Court, C.D. California
DecidedJuly 16, 2021
Docket2:16-cv-08979
StatusUnknown

This text of Sevag Chalian v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc (Sevag Chalian v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, C.D. California primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sevag Chalian v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc, (C.D. Cal. 2021).

Opinion

1 JS-6

7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 SEVAG CHALIAN, et al., CASE NO.: 2:16-cv-08979-AB-AGR Plaintiffs, 11 Related Case No.: 2:20-cv-02401-AB- 12 v. AGR CVS PHARMACY, INC., a Rhode 13 Island corporation; CVS RX Assigned to Hon. André Birotte Jr. 14 SERVICES, INC., a New York corporation; GARFIELD BEACH [PROPOSED] ORDER AND 15 CVS, LLC, a California limited JUDGMENT GRANTING (1) liability company; and DOES 1 thru MOTION FOR ORDER 16 100, inclusive, GRANTING FINAL APPROVAL OF CLASS ACTION 17 Defendants. SETTLEMENT AND (2) MOTION FOR AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ 18 FEES, COSTS, AND CLASS REPRESENTATIVE 19 INCENTIVE/SERVICE AWARDS

20 DATE: December 4, 2020 TIME: 10:00 am 21 PLACE: Crtm. 7B, 350 West First St., Los Angeles, CA 22

23 Complaint Filed: July 20, 2016 Action Removed: December 5, 2016 24

27 1 This matter came before the Court for hearing on December 4, 2020 for final 2 approval of the Settlement. The parties have submitted their Global Settlement 3 Agreement (“Settlement Agreement”) evidencing their proposed settlement (the 4 “Settlement”), which this Court preliminarily approved in its August 5, 2020 Order. 5 In accordance with the preliminary approval order, Settlement Class Members have 6 been given notice of the terms of the Settlement and the opportunity to object to it. 7 In addition, pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act of 2005, 28 U.S.C. § 1715 8 (“CAFA”), the Attorney Generals of each sta te where Settlement Class members 9 resided at the time notice was issued have been given notice of the Settlement. 10 Notice of this Settlement was also provided to the Labor and Workforce 11 Development Agency. 12 The Court has received and considered the Global Settlement Agreement dated 13 March 2, 2020, as amended by the First Amendment to Global Settlement 14 Agreement dated November 6, 2020 and the Second Amendment to Global 15 Settlement Agreement dated March 19, 2021 which the Court hereby approves (all 16 attached hereto as Exhibit A), the supporting papers filed by the parties, and the 17 evidence and argument received by the Court at the final approval hearing on 18 December 4, 2020. For the reasons explained at length in the Court’s concurrently- 19 issued ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR FINAL APPROVAL 20 AND FOR AN AWARD OF ATTORNEYS’ FEES, AND OVERRULING 21 OBJECTIONS, the Court GRANTS final approval of the Settlement, and HEREBY 22 ORDERS and MAKES DETERMINATIONS as follows: 23 24 1. The Motion for Order Granting Final Approval of Class Action 25 Settlement and Motion for Award of Attorneys’ Fees, Costs, and Class 26 Representative Incentive/Service Awards are hereby granted in their entirety. 27 1 Settlement Agreement, attached as Exhibit A. 2 3 3. This Court has jurisdiction over the subject matter of this litigation and 4 over all Parties to this litigation pursuant to the CAFA, including all Settlement Class 5 Members. 6 7 4. Pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and due process, the Court 8 hereby finally approves the Settlement set for th in the Settlement Agreement, as 9 amended, and finds that such Settlement is, in all respects, fair, reasonable and 10 adequate to the Settlement Class and to each Settlement Class Member, that the 11 Settlement is ordered finally approved, and that all terms and provisions of the 12 Settlement should be and hereby are ordered to be consummated. The Court further 13 finds that the Settlement Agreement, as amended, and the Settlement set forth therein 14 were entered into in good faith following arms-length negotiations and is non- 15 collusive, and that the Settlement Classes as defined in the Settlement Agreement be 16 certified for settlement purpose s only pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 23(b)(3). 17 18 5. The Court further finds that the Parties have conducted extensive and 19 costly investigation and research and counsel for the Parties are able to reasonably 20 evaluate their respective positions. The Court also finds that settlement at this time 21 will avoid additional substantial costs, as well as avoid the delay and risks that would 22 be presented by the further prosecution of this case. The Court has noted the 23 significant benefits to the Settlement Class Members under the Settlement. The 24 Court also finds that the Settlement Classes (defined in the Settlement Agreement 25 and below) are properly certified for settlement purposes only under Fed. R. Civ. P. 26 23(b)(3) and are therefore finally certified for settlement purposes only. 27 1 enforced according to its terms. 2 3 7. For purposes of this Judgment, the following Settlement Classes will be 4 certified (collectively referred to as the “Settlement Class”): 5 a. Pharmacist Settlement Class: All hourly, non-exempt retail 6 pharmacists who worked in Regions 65 or 72 in California between July 20, 2012 and 7 the date of the Preliminary Approval Order, whose claims are not subject to arbitration 8 and who have not previously released and/or adjudicated the Released Claims, and 9 whose LEARNet and/or Site Minder data indicates activity when time punch records do 10 not show he or she was clocked-in; and 11 b. Retail Pharmacy Settlement Class: Any person who is not a member 12 of the Pharmacist Settlement Class who held an hourly, non-exempt position in a CVS 13 retail pharmacy in the State of California between August 3, 2014 and the date of the 14 Preliminary Approval Order who has not previously released and/or adjudicated the 15 Released Claims. 16 17 8.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Sevag Chalian v. CVS Pharmacy, Inc, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sevag-chalian-v-cvs-pharmacy-inc-cacd-2021.