Senat v. State

99 So. 3d 558, 2012 WL 3705098, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14339
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Senat v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8439
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided August 29, 2012·No. No. 3D12-1517·Published

Opinion

SUAREZ, J.

Christian Senat appeals from a denial of relief pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850. We dismiss this appeal without prejudice in order that the petitioner may obtain a signed, written order filed with the clerk of the lower tribunal, and included in the record on appeal. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h); see Favata v. State, 917 So.2d 1012, 1012 (Fla. 1st DCA 2006) (“To the extent that the appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, we decline to address the propriety of that denial because the record fails to contain a signed, written order disposing of the appellant’s motion.”).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Senat v. State, 99 So. 3d 558, 2012 WL 3705098, 2012 Fla. App. LEXIS 14339 (Fla. Ct. App. 2012).

99 So. 3d 558 (Senat v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Favata v. State
917 So. 2d 1012 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2006)