Favata v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Favata v. State

917 So. 2d 1012, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 31, 2006 WL 20492

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 5, 2006

DocketNo. 1D05-894

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 917 So. 2d 1012 (Favata v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Favata v. State, 917 So. 2d 1012, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 31, 2006 WL 20492 (Fla. Ct. App. 2006).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed. To the extent that the appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, we decline to address the propriety of that denial because the record fails to contain a signed, written order disposing of the appellant’s motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant’s judgment and sentence are affirmed. To the extent that the appellant challenges the trial court’s denial of his Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion for postconviction relief, we decline to address the propriety of that denial because the record fails to contain a signed, written order disposing of the appellant’s motion. See Fla. R.App. P. 9.020(h).

AFFIRMED.

ALLEN, VAN NORTWICK and POLSTON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

917 So. 2d 1012, 2006 Fla. App. LEXIS 31, 2006 WL 20492, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/favata-v-state-fladistctapp-2006.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack