SENAT v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

SENAT v. State

62 So. 3d 1236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8439, 2011 WL 2279534

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJune 10, 2011

Docket2D10-440

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 62 So. 3d 1236 (SENAT v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

SENAT v. State, 62 So. 3d 1236, 2011 Fla. App. LEXIS 8439, 2011 WL 2279534 (Fla. Ct. App. 2011).

Pincite

Opinion

BLACK, Judge.

Jethro Senat appeals the trial court’s order revoking his probation for leaving the county of his residence without permission (condition number three) and committing the new law violation of corruption by threat against a public servant (condition number five). We affirm without comment the trial court’s order; however, we remand with directions to correct a scrivener’s error.

The trial court orally found that Senat violated conditions three and five of his probation, but the written order reflects that Senat violated conditions two, five, and special condition x. To avoid future confusion, the discrepancy between the oral pronouncement and the written order requires that the order be corrected to reflect the specific conditions of the probation violation. See Feezel v. State, 463 So.2d 1244,1245 (Fla. 2d DCA 1985).

Affirmed; remanded with directions.

WHATLEY and MORRIS, JJ., Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI