Seligman v. Victor Talking Machine Co.

73 A. 1118, 72 N.J. Eq. 946, 2 Buchanan 946, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 335
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided June 17, 1907·Published·Cited by 6 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The decree appealed from will be affirmed, for the reasons stated in the opinion delivered by Vice-Chancellor Garrison in the court below.

For affirmance—Ti-ie Chief-Justice, Garrison, Fort, Hendrickson, Swayze, Reed, Trenchard, Bogert, Vredenburgh, Vroom, Green, Gray, Dill—13. For reversal—None.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Seligman v. Victor Talking Machine Co., 73 A. 1118, 72 N.J. Eq. 946, 2 Buchanan 946, 1907 N.J. LEXIS 335 (N.J. 1907).

73 A. 1118 (Seligman v. Victor Talking Machine Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. New York Central Railroad Co.
116 A.2d 800 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1955)
Kosich v. Poultrymen's Service Corp.
43 A.2d 15 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1945)
Benton v. Kernan
6 A.2d 195 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1939)
Melucci v. Eagan
1 A.2d 452 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1938)
Lyndhurst v. United Cork Cos.
172 A. 347 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1934)
Hauser v. Kraeuter Co.
129 A. 473 (New Jersey Court of Chancery, 1925)