Segura v. City of San Diego

District Court, S.D. California·Decided June 28, 2023·No. 3:22-cv-01029·Unknown

Opinion

HECTOR SEGURA, Case No.: 3:22-cv-01029-RBM-AHG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’ EX PARTE MOTION TO v. CONTINUE EARLY NEUTRAL CITY OF SAN DIEGO, et al., EVALUATION CONFERENCE AND CASE MANAGEMENT Defendants. CONFERENCE [ECF No. 23] Before the Court is Defendants’ ex parte motion to continue the Early Neutral Evaluation Conference (“ENE”) and Case Management Conference (“CMC”), presently scheduled for July 12, 2023. ECF No. 23. Defendants request that the ENE and CMC be rescheduled because Defendants’ claims representative with settlement authority will be unavailable on that date. Id. at 2. Further, Defendants seek an extension of pre-conference deadlines because they have been unable to meet and confer with Plaintiff pursuant to Rule 26(f), as required by the Court’s order setting the ENE and CMC, despite numerous attempts via email, phone, letter, and personal service. ECF No. 23-1. Court staff also attempted to reach Plaintiff, to no avail. Email from Chambers (June 20, 2023, at 6:01 PM). The Court appreciates Defendants’ thorough motion, and finds good cause to GRANT the motion as follows: 1. The Court reminds Plaintiff of his duty to comply with Court-ordered conferences and deadlines. One such deadline is the deadline to meet and confer with Defendants’ counsel pursuant to Rule 26(f). Further lack of participation by Plaintiff, such as by failing to participate in a Rule 26(f) conference or by failing to attend the ENE, will be considered grounds for the undersigned to issue an Order to Show Cause regarding a report and recommendation of dismissal for failure to prosecute. See FED. R. CIV. P. 41(b). 2. The ENE and CMC scheduled for July 12, 2023, are RESET for August 16, 2023 at 2:00 p.m. via videoconference before Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard. In accordance with the Local Rules, the Court requires attendance of all parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, and the primary attorney(s) responsible for the litigation via videoconference. CivLR 16.1(c)(1). 3. Purpose of the Conference: The purpose of the ENE is to permit an informal discussion between the attorneys, pro se parties, and the settlement judge of every aspect of the lawsuit in an effort to achieve an early resolution of the case. All conference discussions will be informal, off the record, and confidential. 4. Full Settlement Authority Required: A party or party representative with full and complete authority to enter into a binding settlement must be present via videoconference. Full authority to settle means that a person must be authorized to fully explore settlement options and to agree at that time to any settlement terms acceptable to the parties. Heileman Brewing Co., Inc. v. Joseph Oat Corp., 871 F.2d 648, 653 (7th Cir. 1989). The person needs to have “unfettered discretion and authority” to change the settlement position of a party. Pitman v. Brinker Int’l, Inc., 216 F.R.D. 481, 485–86 (D. Ariz. 2003). Limited or sum certain authority is not adequate. Nick v. Morgan’s Foods, Inc., 270 F.3d 590, 595–97 (8th Cir. 2001). A person who needs to call another person who is not present on the videoconference before agreeing to any settlement does not have full authority. 5. Confidential ENE Statements Required: No later than August 9, 2023, the parties shall submit confidential statements of five (5) pages or less directly to the chambers of Magistrate Judge Goddard outlining the nature of the case, the claims, and the defenses. These statements shall not be filed or served on opposing counsel. They shall be lodged via email at efile_goddard@casd.uscourts.gov. The ENE statement is limited to five (5) pages or less, and up to five (5) pages of exhibits or declarations. Each party’s ENE statement must outline: A. the nature of the case and the claims, B. position on liability or defense, C. position regarding settlement of the case with a specific1 demand/offer for settlement,2 and D. any previous settlement negotiations or mediation efforts. 6. Case Management Conference: In the event the case does not settle at the ENE, the Court will immediately thereafter hold a Case Management Conference (“CMC”) pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b). The Court orders the following to occur before the CMC: A. The parties must meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(f) no later than July 24, 2023. B. The parties must file a Joint Case Management Statement by August 4, 2023. The Joint Case Management Statement must address all points in the “Joint Case Management Statement Requirements for Magistrate Judge Allison H. Goddard,” which can be found on the court website at:

1 A general statement, such as that a party “will negotiate in good faith,” is a not a specific demand or offer.

2 If a specific demand or offer cannot be made at the time the ENE statement is submitted, then the reasons as to why a demand or offer cannot be made must be stated. Further, the https://www.casd.uscourts.gov/Judges/goddard/docs/Goddard%20Join t%20Case%20Management%20Statement%20Rules.pdf. C. Initial disclosures pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1)(A-D) must occur by August 7, 2023. 7. Appearances via Videoconference Required: All named parties, party representatives, including claims adjusters for insured defendants, as well as principal attorney(s) responsible for the litigation must attend the ENE via videoconference. All who attend the ENE must be legally and factually prepared to discuss and resolve the case. Counsel appearing without their clients (whether or not counsel has been given settlement authority) will be subject to immediate imposition of sanctions. To facilitate the videoconference ENE, the Court hereby orders as follows: A. The Court will use its official Zoom video conferencing account to hold the ENE. If you are unfamiliar with Zoom: Zoom is available on computers through a download on the Zoom website (https://zoom.us/meetings) or on mobile devices through the installation of a free app.3 Joining a Zoom conference does not require creating a Zoom account, but it does require downloading the .exe file (if using a computer) or the app (if using a mobile device). Participants are encouraged to create an account, install Zoom and familiarize themselves with Zoom in advance of the ENE.4 There is a cost-free option for creating a Zoom account. B. Prior to the start of the ENE, the Court will email each participant an invitation to join a Zoom video conference. Again, if possible,

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Segura v. City of San Diego, (S.D. Cal. 2023).

Segura v. City of San Diego (Segura v. City of San Diego) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related