Home/Supreme Court/Sebring Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

Sebring Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission

444 U.S. 879, 62 L. Ed. 2d 109
CourtSupreme Court of the United States
DecidedOctober 1, 1979
DocketNo. 78-1878
StatusPublished
Cited by46 cases

This text of 444 U.S. 879 (Sebring Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sebring Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, 444 U.S. 879, 62 L. Ed. 2d 109 (1979).

Opinion

C. A. 5th Cir. Certiorari denied.

Mr. Justice Stewart took no part in the consideration or decision of this petition.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United Distribution Companies v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Windward Energy & Marketing Company, Intervenors
88 F.3d 1105 (D.C. Circuit, 1996)
Texas American Oil Corporation v. United States Department of Energy
44 F.3d 1557 (Federal Circuit, 1995)
United States v. Abcasis
785 F. Supp. 1113 (E.D. New York, 1992)
Algonquin Gas Transmission Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Boston Gas Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, the City of Norwich, Connecticut, Colonial Gas Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., Bay State Gas Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, Intervenors. Central Hudson Gas and Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, the City of Norwich, Connecticut, Colonial Gas Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., Bay State Gas Company, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Boston Gas Company, New England Power Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., Intervenors. Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Colonial Gas Company, Bay State Gas Company, Boston Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., the City of Norwich, Connecticut, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Intervenors. City of Norwich, Connecticut, Department of Public Utilities, and the Town of Middleborough, Massachusetts, Municipal Gas and Electric Department v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Colonial Gas Company, Bay State Gas Company, Boston Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., Intervenors. New Jersey Natural Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Boston Gas Company, Bay State Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Colonial Gas Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., the City of Norwich, Connecticut, Intervenors. Boston Gas Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Algonquin Gas Transmission Company, Bay State Gas Company, Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corporation, Colonial Gas Company, Consolidated Edison Company of New York, Inc., New England Power Company, New Jersey Natural Gas Company, Orange and Rockland Utilities, Inc., the City of Norwich, Connecticut, National Helium Corporation, Intervenors
948 F.2d 1305 (D.C. Circuit, 1991)
Algonquin Gas Transmission Co. v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
948 F.2d 1305 (D.C. Circuit, 1991)
In re Phillips Petroleum Co.
943 F.2d 63 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1991)
Pennzoil Exploration & Production Co. v. Lujan
928 F.2d 1139 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1991)
United States v. Miguel Matias, Sr., Jose Caraballo, Miguel Matias, Jr., Frankie Matias, Luis Garcia, Miguel Matias, Sr., and Jose Caraballo
836 F.2d 744 (Second Circuit, 1988)
City of Farmington, New Mexico v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Amoco Production Company, Amoco Gas Company, Intervenors
820 F.2d 1308 (D.C. Circuit, 1987)
TransAmerican Natural Gas Corp. v. United States Dept. of Interior
816 F.2d 689 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1987)
Exxon Corp. v. Department of Energy
802 F.2d 1400 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1986)
Office of Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Process Gas Consumers Group, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Consumer Advocate for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, Washington Gas Light Company, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Intervenors. Associated Gas Distributors v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation, Washington Gas Light Company, Interstate Gas Association of America, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Intervenors. Public Service Commission of the State of New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Washington Gas Light Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Exxon Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Process Gas Consumers Group, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Citizen/labor Energy Coalition v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Consumers' Counsel, State of Ohio, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Baltimore Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Dayton Power and Light Company, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Process Gas Consumers Group, Washington Gas Light Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors. Process Gas Consumers Group v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Office of Consumers' Counsel, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Washington Gas Light Company, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, Pennsylvania Department of Commerce, Association of Businesses Advocating Tariff Equity, American Iron and Steel Institute, Georgia Industrial Group, Intervenors. Columbia Gas Transmission Corporation v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Ugi Corporation, Dayton Power and Light Company, Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Process Gas Consumers Group, Public Service Commission of the State of New York, Pennsylvania Gas and Water Company, Columbia Gas Distribution Companies, Ohio Office of Consumers' Counsel, Washington Gas Light Company, Associated Gas Distributors, Baltimore Gas and Electric Company, Cities of Charlottesville and Richmond, Virginia, Interstate Natural Gas Association of America, Transwestern Pipeline Company, Texas Eastern Transmission Corporation, Maryland Office of People's Counsel, the Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and Union Light, Heat & Power Company, Consumer Advocate Division of the Public Service Commission of West Virginia, Public Utilities Commission of Ohio, Intervenors
783 F.2d 206 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
783 F.2d 206 (D.C. Circuit, 1986)
Elf Aquitaine, Inc. v. Placid Oil Co.
624 F. Supp. 994 (D. Delaware, 1985)
Sector Refining, Inc. v. Enterprise Refining Co.
771 F.2d 496 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1985)
Colorado Energy Advocacy Office v. Public Service Co.
704 P.2d 298 (Supreme Court of Colorado, 1985)
United States Department of Energy v. West Texas Marketing Corp.
763 F.2d 1411 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1985)
United States v. Massino
605 F. Supp. 1565 (S.D. New York, 1985)
Shepherd Oil, Inc. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.
734 F.2d 23 (Temporary Emergency Court of Appeals, 1984)
Fort Pierce Utility Authority of the City of Fort Pierce v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
724 F.2d 1167 (Fifth Circuit, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
444 U.S. 879, 62 L. Ed. 2d 109, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sebring-utilities-commission-v-federal-energy-regulatory-commission-scotus-1979.