Seabury v. Johnson

76 F. 456, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2890
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey
DecidedSeptember 18, 1896
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 76 F. 456 (Seabury v. Johnson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of New Jersey primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Seabury v. Johnson, 76 F. 456, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2890 (circtdnj 1896).

Opinion

GREEN, District Judge.

The complainants have brought this suit to restrain the defendants from infringing letters patent of the United States granted to one Charles H. Shaw, for a “new and useful improvement in disinfectants.” The letters patent are dated October 2, 1888, and are numbered 390,314. Practically, the invention is for a particular form of a “sulphur candle.” In describing his invention, Mr. Shaw, in the specifications, referring to the accompanying diagram or drawing, says:

[457]*457“Tlie candle in this example of my improvement has a body, a, of cyli'idrie form, provided on the upper side, at about Ibe center, with a nipple or projection, a'. Around the body, a, extends a. band, b, which is preferably made of metal, and extends slightly above the top of said body, in order that it may prevent the flowing over of any liquified sulphur upon any article on which the candle may be placed and burned. This band may simply be retained by friction in place around the body, or it may be secured in any other suitable manner. There may be a plate of metal beneath the bottom of the body, a, of ¡he candle, if desirable, and, in case such a plate should be_ employed, it might be secured to the lower edge of the band, b. The candle in this example of my improvement is shown as being of largo diameter compared with

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Columbus Chain Co. v. Standard Chain Co.
148 F. 622 (Sixth Circuit, 1906)
Schreiber & Conchar Mfg. Co. v. Adams Co.
117 F. 830 (Eighth Circuit, 1902)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 F. 456, 1896 U.S. App. LEXIS 2890, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/seabury-v-johnson-circtdnj-1896.