Scriptomatic, Inc. v. United States District Court, and Speedaddress, Inc., and Real Parties in Interest
This text of 545 F.2d 1156 (Scriptomatic, Inc. v. United States District Court, and Speedaddress, Inc., and Real Parties in Interest) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
This case is controlled by Commercial Lighting Products, Inc. v. United States District Court (9th Cir. 1976), 537 F.2d 1078.
The contacts with the state to which the district court transferred the action were no more substantial than those in Commercial Lighting Products, Inc., supra. Here, only one of the California residents ever visited Minnesota. Aside from letters and telephone calls, the remaining connection is an averment in the complaint, as yet unsubstantiated, that a conspiracy existed to restrain trade in both states.
We vacate the transfer order and direct that the case proceed in the Central District of California.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
545 F.2d 1156, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7568, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scriptomatic-inc-v-united-states-district-court-and-speedaddress-inc-ca9-1976.