Scriptomatic, Inc. v. United States District Court, and Speedaddress, Inc., and Real Parties in Interest

545 F.2d 1156, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7568
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided August 16, 1976·No. 75-3415·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinions

PER CURIAM:

This case is controlled by Commercial Lighting Products, Inc. v. United States District Court (9th Cir. 1976), 537 F.2d 1078.

The contacts with the state to which the district court transferred the action were no more substantial than those in Commercial Lighting Products, Inc., supra. Here, only one of the California residents ever visited Minnesota. Aside from letters and telephone calls, the remaining connection is an averment in the complaint, as yet unsubstantiated, that a conspiracy existed to restrain trade in both states.

We vacate the transfer order and direct that the case proceed in the Central District of California.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scriptomatic, Inc. v. United States District Court, and Speedaddress, Inc., and Real Parties in Interest, 545 F.2d 1156, 1976 U.S. App. LEXIS 7568 (9th Cir. 1976).

545 F.2d 1156 (Scriptomatic, Inc. v. United States District Court, and Speedaddress, Inc., and Real Parties in Interest) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related