Scott v. State
948 So. 2d 1005, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2401, 2007 WL 518343
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided February 21, 2007·No. No. 4D06-1612·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Appellant, Thomas L. Scott, appeals his conviction and sentence for possession of cocaine and possession of marijuana less than 20 grams. These charges arose from a traffic stop due to a violation of the Palm Beach County curfew ordinance issued after Hurricane Wilma. Scott argues on appeal that the trial court erred in denying his motion to suppress, which alleged, inter alia, that the stop was illegal, as the curfew ordinance was unconstitutional and enacted without lawful authority. We affirm, finding no merit in Scott’s position.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 948 So. 2d 1005, 2007 Fla. App. LEXIS 2401, 2007 WL 518343 (Fla. Ct. App. 2007).
948 So. 2d 1005 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Mendoza v. State
948 So. 2d 1005 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2007)