Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/Scott v. State

Scott v. State

900 So. 2d 706, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5947, 2005 WL 954892
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 825 So. 2d 1067 →
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 27, 2005·No. No. 2D04-3750·Published

Opinion

NORTHCUTT, Judge.

Jacob Wesley Scott appeals the summary denial of his motion to correct illegal sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.800(a) and his motion to define or clarify sentence filed pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.700(b). We affirm the denial of both motions without comment. Our affir-mance is without prejudice to any additional right Scott may have to file a motion for jail credit pursuant to rule 3.800(a) as a result of the amended award of jail credit Scott received pursuant to the trial court’s order denying Scott’s rule 3.800(a) and 3.700(b) motions. Any such motion for jail credit will not be deemed successive.

Affirmed.

STRINGER and KELLY, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. State, 900 So. 2d 706, 2005 Fla. App. LEXIS 5947, 2005 WL 954892 (Fla. Ct. App. 2005).

900 So. 2d 706 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.