Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scott v. State

811 So. 2d 697, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 230, 2002 WL 51303

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 16, 2002

DocketNo. 2D00-3401

StatusPublished

This text of 811 So. 2d 697 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 811 So. 2d 697, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 230, 2002 WL 51303 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

David Dwayne Scott challenges his conviction and sentence for armed robbery. He argues that the Public Defender’s representation of both him and his codefend-ant created a conflict that violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We disagree without comment and affirm without prejudice to Scott filing a facially sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, if he is able to do so.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIS, Judge.

David Dwayne Scott challenges his conviction and sentence for armed robbery. He argues that the Public Defender’s representation of both him and his codefend-ant created a conflict that violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We disagree without comment and affirm without prejudice to Scott filing a facially sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, if he is able to do so.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, Concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

811 So. 2d 697, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 230, 2002 WL 51303, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-fladistctapp-2002.