Scott v. State
884 So. 2d 101, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5607, 2004 WL 868247
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 813 So. 2d 1025 →
Opinion
Affirmed. See Teal v. State, 862 So.2d 871 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003); McCall v. State, 862 So.2d 807 (Fla. 2d DCA 2003). As this court did in both Teal and McCall, we certify direct conflict with Richardson v. State, 884 So.2d 950, 2003 WL 21697171 (Fla. 4th DCA July 23, 2003).
Affirmed; conflict certified.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scott v. State, 884 So. 2d 101, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 5607, 2004 WL 868247 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).
884 So. 2d 101 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richardson v. State
884 So. 2d 950 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2004)
McCall v. State
862 So. 2d 807 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)
Teal v. State
862 So. 2d 871 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2003)