Scott v. State

811 So. 2d 697, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 230, 2002 WL 51303

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Scott v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 2213 →

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided January 16, 2002·No. No. 2D00-3401·Published

Opinion

DAVIS, Judge.

David Dwayne Scott challenges his conviction and sentence for armed robbery. He argues that the Public Defender’s representation of both him and his codefend-ant created a conflict that violated his Sixth Amendment right to counsel. We disagree without comment and affirm without prejudice to Scott filing a facially sufficient Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.850 motion, if he is able to do so.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, Concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DAVIS, Judge.

Affirmed.

NORTHCUTT, J., and DANAHY, PAUL W., Senior Judge, Concur.

Scott v. State, 811 So. 2d 697, 2002 Fla. App. LEXIS 230, 2002 WL 51303 (Fla. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

811 So. 2d 697 (Scott v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.