Scott v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Scott v. State

747 So. 2d 1048, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 71, 2000 WL 4852

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedJanuary 5, 2000

DocketNo. 99-3356

StatusPublished

This text of 747 So. 2d 1048 (Scott v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Scott v. State, 747 So. 2d 1048, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 71, 2000 WL 4852 (Fla. Ct. App. 2000).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Earl Scott appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which he raised several grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel and trial court error. We reverse and remand for further proceedings on one of his claims.

Scott alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective during his cross examination of identification witness Joe Adams. The record furnished to this court does not address this point.

On remand the trial court should either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach excerpts from the trial record that conclusively refute the allegations in the motion.

POLEN, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Earl Scott appeals the summary denial of his motion for post-conviction relief, filed pursuant to rule 3.850, Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure, in which he raised several grounds of ineffective assistance of counsel and trial court error. We reverse and remand for further proceedings on one of his claims.

Scott alleges that his trial counsel was ineffective during his cross examination of identification witness Joe Adams. The record furnished to this court does not address this point.

On remand the trial court should either conduct an evidentiary hearing or attach excerpts from the trial record that conclusively refute the allegations in the motion.

POLEN, FARMER and STEVENSON, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

747 So. 2d 1048, 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 71, 2000 WL 4852, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-state-fladistctapp-2000.