Scott v. Quigley

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III, Case No. 3:23-CV-00264-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 y MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT ROBERT QUIGLEY, et a/., ° Defendants. 9 10 On February 24, 2025, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele v. Ejikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9th Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9th Cir. 1998) (ECF No. 27). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to Thursday, April 17, 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions 16 | of time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted 17 | to the court for decision. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED: March 18, 2025 . 20 21 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28