Scott v. Quigley

Opinion

1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, Case No. 3:23-CV-00258-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION TO 6 MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

7 V.

DR. QUIGLEY, et al., Defendants. 9 10 On December 20, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECI No. 30.) Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingel v. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9'" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9" Cil 13 | 1998) (ECF No. 34). To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 14 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff one extension of time to February 18 15 | 2025, to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions of 16 | time shall be granted. If Plaintiff fails to file an opposition, the motion will be submitted to 17 | the court for decision. 18 IT IS SO ORDERED. 19 DATED: January 15, 2025 . 20 21 UNITED STATES\MAGISTRATE JUDGE 22 23 24 25 26 27 28