Scott v. Quigley
This text of Scott v. Quigley (Scott v. Quigley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, D. Nevada primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 kee 4 JAMES EDWARD SCOTT, III, Case No. 3:23-CV-00270-ART-CLB 5 Plaintiff, ORDER TO FILE OPPOSITION OR RESPONSE TO MOTION FOR 6 V. SUMMARY JUDGMENT 7 QUIGLEY, et ai/., 8 Defendants. 9 10 On December 13, 2024, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 51.) An opposition or response to this motion was due on or before Friday, January 3, 2025. Plaintiff was given notice of the motion pursuant to the requirements of Klingele Vv. Eikenberry, 849 F.2d 409 (9"" Cir. 1988), and Rand v. Rowland, 154 F.3d 952 (9" Cir. 1998). (ECF No. 55.) To date, Plaintiff has failed to file an opposition. 15 The Court will sua sponte grant Plaintiff an extension of time to Tuesday, January 16 21, 2025 to file an opposition to the motion for summary judgment. No further extensions 17 of time shall be granted absent extraordinary circumstances. If Plaintiff fails to file an 48 opposition, the motion will be submitted to the Court for decision. 49 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 DATED this 7" day of January 2025. . 21 22 La 23 24 25 26 27 28
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Scott v. Quigley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/scott-v-quigley-nvd-2025.