Scott v. Annucci

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided September 7, 2023·No. 1:23-cv-06921·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK JAMES SCOTT, Plaintiff, 23-CV-6921 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL COMMISSIONER ANTHONY ANNUCCI, ET AL., Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: On September 5, 2023, the Court received a letter from Plaintiff James Scott, advising the Court that he did not intend to file this action and did not authorize anyone to file this action on his behalf. The Court grants Plaintiff’s request to withdraw this action, as opened in error. The Clerk of Court is directed not to charge Plaintiff the $350.00 filing fee for this action, and the Warden or Superintendent having custody of Plaintiff is directed to suspend any previously authorized monetary deduction from Plaintiff’s prison trust account for this lawsuit. The Clerk of Court is further directed to close this case and terminate all pending deadlines. The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962). SO ORDERED. Dated: September 7, 2023 New York, New York

/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Scott v. Annucci, (S.D.N.Y. 2023).

Scott v. Annucci (Scott v. Annucci) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Coppedge v. United States
369 U.S. 438 (Supreme Court, 1962)