Sciabbarrasi v. Uddo

466 So. 2d 19, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 822
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 28, 1985·No. 84-690·Published·Cited by 8 cases

Opinion

466 So.2d 19 (1985)

Andrew SCIABBARRASI, Appellant,
v.
Joseph UDDO, Jr., et al., Appellees.

No. 84-690.

District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.

March 28, 1985.

*20 Leon M. Boyajan, II of J. Russell Hornsby, P.A., Orlando, for appellant.

J. Don Friedman of Friedman & Friedman, P.A., Longwood, for appellee Joseph Uddo, Jr.

FRANK D. UPCHURCH, Jr., Judge.

The order appealed, the denial of a motion for leave to amend an answer and counterclaim, is not a final order, see generally Pruitt v. Brock, 437 So.2d 768 (Fla. 1st DCA 1983); SCI, Inc. v. Aneco Co., 410 So.2d 531 (Fla. 2d DCA 1982), nor is it a non-final order which may be reviewed under Florida Rule of Appellate Procedure 9.130. Common law certiorari is also not available to review the order. See Hawaiian Inn v. Snead Const. Corp., 393 So.2d 1201 (Fla. 5th DCA 1981).

DISMISSED.

DAUKSCH and ORFINGER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Sciabbarrasi v. Uddo, 466 So. 2d 19, 10 Fla. L. Weekly 822 (Fla. Ct. App. 1985).

466 So. 2d 19 (Sciabbarrasi v. Uddo) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Casey v. Inch
275 So. 3d 686 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2019)
Davis v. Crews
135 So. 3d 433 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2014)
Majestic Sun Owners' Ass'n v. Florida Condos I Ltd. Partnership
895 So. 2d 534 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2005)
Villareal v. Craig
813 So. 2d 984 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)
Venus Laboratories, Inc. v. Katz
573 So. 2d 993 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1991)
D & R Builders, Inc. v. Hans Hangar, Inc.
485 So. 2d 899 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1986)