Casey v. Inch
This text of 274 So. 3d 425 (Casey v. Inch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.
We have determined that the petition raises a frivolous claim. Petitioner is warned that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2018) (providing that a prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim, proceeding, or appeal is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections).
Ray, Osterhaus, and Winokur, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
274 So. 3d 425, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/casey-v-inch-fladistctapp-2019.