Brian M. Casey v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida

District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided April 22, 2019·No. 19-1008·Published

Opinion

FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA

No. 1D19-1008

BRIAN M. CASEY,

Petitioner,

v.

MARK S. INCH, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida,

Respondent.

Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus—Original Jurisdiction.

April 22, 2019

PER CURIAM.

The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied.

We have determined that the petition raises a frivolous claim.

Petitioner is warned that any future filings that this Court determines to be frivolous may result in the imposition of sanctions, including a prohibition against any further pro se filings in this Court and a referral to the appropriate institution for disciplinary procedures as provided in section 944.279, Florida Statutes (2018) (providing that a prisoner who is found by a court to have brought a frivolous or malicious suit, action, claim,

proceeding, or appeal is subject to disciplinary procedures pursuant to the rules of the Department of Corrections).

RAY, OSTERHAUS, and WINOKUR, JJ., concur.

Not final until disposition of any timely and authorized motion under Fla. R. App. P. 9.330 or 9.331.

Brian M. Casey, pro se, Petitioner.

Kenneth S. Steely, General Counsel, Department of Corrections, Tallahassee, for Respondent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brian M. Casey v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida, (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Brian M. Casey v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida (Brian M. Casey v. Mark S. Inch, Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections, State of Florida) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.