Schutzler v. Times Publishing Co.
This text of 152 P. 1018 (Schutzler v. Times Publishing Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant brought this action to recover damages for an alleged libel. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint and sustained. Appellant did not stand upon his demurrer and invite the adverse judgment of the court. There is no judgment of dismissal.
[237]*237This court has repeatedly held, under Rem. and Bal. Code, § 1716, and in line with a universally accepted rule of practice, that an appeal will not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer. Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389, 25 Pac. 330; Olsen v. Newton, 3 Wash. 429, 30 Pac. 450; Mason County v. Dunbar, 10 Wash. 163, 38 Pac. 1003; Padley v. Gregg, 26 Wash. 322, 67 Pac. 72; Seattle & N. R. Co. v. Bowman, 46 Wash. 90, 89 Pac. 399, 96 Pac. 837.
This appeal is premature, and the case is remanded for further proceedings, with costs to respondent.
Morris, C. J., Mount, Ellis, and Fullerton, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
152 P. 1018, 88 Wash. 236, 1915 Wash. LEXIS 1107, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schutzler-v-times-publishing-co-wash-1915.