Schutzler v. Times Publishing Co.

152 P. 1018, 88 Wash. 236, 1915 Wash. LEXIS 1107
Washington Supreme Court·Decided November 20, 1915·No. No. 12905·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Chadwick, J.

Appellant brought this action to recover damages for an alleged libel. A demurrer was interposed to the complaint and sustained. Appellant did not stand upon his demurrer and invite the adverse judgment of the court. There is no judgment of dismissal.

[237] This court has repeatedly held, under Rem. and Bal. Code, § 1716, and in line with a universally accepted rule of practice, that an appeal will not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer. Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389, 25 Pac. 330; Olsen v. Newton, 3 Wash. 429, 30 Pac. 450; Mason County v. Dunbar, 10 Wash. 163, 38 Pac. 1003; Padley v. Gregg, 26 Wash. 322, 67 Pac. 72; Seattle & N. R. Co. v. Bowman, 46 Wash. 90, 89 Pac. 399, 96 Pac. 837.

This appeal is premature, and the case is remanded for further proceedings, with costs to respondent.

Morris, C. J., Mount, Ellis, and Fullerton, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Schutzler v. Times Publishing Co., 152 P. 1018, 88 Wash. 236, 1915 Wash. LEXIS 1107 (Wash. 1915).

152 P. 1018 (Schutzler v. Times Publishing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

McLennan v. New Light Gold Mining Co.
127 P.2d 415 (Washington Supreme Court, 1942)
Anderson v. East Gate Temple Ass'n
64 P.2d 510 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Kelly-Springfield Tire Co. v. Lotta Miles Tire Co.
225 P. 626 (Washington Supreme Court, 1924)
Whitehead v. Stringer
180 P. 486 (Washington Supreme Court, 1919)