Padley v. Gregg
67 P. 72, 26 Wash. 322, 1901 Wash. LEXIS 647
Opinion
Motion is made to dismiss the appeal in this case for the reason that said appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer. The record showing that the appeal was talten from the order of the court sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s complaint, the motion must he sustained, as we have decided in Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389 (25 Pac. 330), and Mason County v. Dunbar, 10 Wash. 163 (38 Pac. 1003), that an appeal will not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer. The case falls within the rule announced in those cases, and the appeal is dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Padley v. Gregg, 67 P. 72, 26 Wash. 322, 1901 Wash. LEXIS 647 (Wash. 1901).
67 P. 72 (Padley v. Gregg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Anderson v. East Gate Temple Ass'n
64 P.2d 510 (Washington Supreme Court, 1937)
Schutzler v. Times Publishing Co.
152 P. 1018 (Washington Supreme Court, 1915)
Zellar v. Siemens
107 P. 1054 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
Seattle & Northern Railway Co. v. Bowman
89 P. 399 (Washington Supreme Court, 1907)
Vaktaren Publishing Co. v. Pacific Tribune Publishing Co.
83 P. 426 (Washington Supreme Court, 1906)
State ex rel. Small v. Fleming
79 P. 1115 (Washington Supreme Court, 1905)