Padley v. Gregg

Washington Supreme Court

Padley v. Gregg

67 P. 72, 26 Wash. 322, 1901 Wash. LEXIS 647

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedOctober 26, 1901

DocketNo. 3957

StatusPublished

Cited by6 cases

This text of 67 P. 72 (Padley v. Gregg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Padley v. Gregg, 67 P. 72, 26 Wash. 322, 1901 Wash. LEXIS 647 (Wash. 1901).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Motion is made to dismiss the appeal in this case for the reason that said appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer. The record showing that the appeal was talten from the order of the court sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s complaint, the motion must he sustained, as we have decided in Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389 (25 Pac. 330), and Mason County v. Dunbar, 10 Wash. 163 (38 Pac. 1003), that an appeal will not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer. The case falls within the rule announced in those cases, and the appeal is dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Motion is made to dismiss the appeal in this case for the reason that said appeal is from an order sustaining a demurrer. The record showing that the appeal was talten from the order of the court sustaining a demurrer to appellant’s complaint, the motion must he sustained, as we have decided in Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389 (25 Pac. 330), and Mason County v. Dunbar, 10 Wash. 163 (38 Pac. 1003), that an appeal will not lie from an order sustaining a demurrer. The case falls within the rule announced in those cases, and the appeal is dismissed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

67 P. 72, 26 Wash. 322, 1901 Wash. LEXIS 647, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/padley-v-gregg-wash-1901.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack