Zellar v. Siemens

107 P. 1054, 58 Wash. 116, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 902
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 30, 1910
DocketNo. 8468
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 107 P. 1054 (Zellar v. Siemens) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Zellar v. Siemens, 107 P. 1054, 58 Wash. 116, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 902 (Wash. 1910).

Opinion

Parker, J.

On July 30, 1909, appellant filed in the superior court for Adams county a petition to vacate a default judgment, previously rendered against him in favor of re[117]*117spondent in that court. Respondent filed a general demurrer to the petition, alleging that it did not state facts sufficient to ■ constitute a cause for vacation of the judgment. On August 16, 1909, the demurrer, being submitted to the court upon argument, was sustained. The record brought here does not show any indication of appellant’s election to stand upon his petition and not plead further; nor does it show any order of dismissal of the petition, or any order finally disposing of the matter. The language of appellant’s notice of appeal is somewhat involved, and if the record before us showed any final disposition of the matter, we might infer from the language of the notice that it was an attempt to appeal from such final disposition; but since the order sustaining the demurrer is the last act of the court shown by the record before us, we must conclude that this is an attempt to appeal from that order sustaining the demurrer.

It is clear from the statute and our previous decisions that this appeal must be dismissed, because it is not taken from an appealable order. An order sustaining a demurrer is not final, and hence, not appealable. Rem. & Bal. Code, §1716; Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389, 25 Pac. 330; Olsen v. Newton, 3 Wash. 429, 30 Pac. 450; Mason County v. Dunbar, 10 Wash. 163, 38 Pac. 1003; Padley v. Gregg, 26 Wash. 322, 67 Pac. 72; State ex rel. Small v. Fleming, 37 Wash. 531, 79 Pac. 1115.

Appeal is dismissed.

Rudkin, C. J., Dunbar, Mount, and Crow, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Borell v. Carson
129 P. 908 (Washington Supreme Court, 1913)
Bills v. Reeder
107 P. 1055 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)
Commercial & Savings Bank v. Wamoch
107 P. 1055 (Washington Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
107 P. 1054, 58 Wash. 116, 1910 Wash. LEXIS 902, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/zellar-v-siemens-wash-1910.