McLennan v. New Light Gold Mining Co.

Washington Supreme Court

McLennan v. New Light Gold Mining Co.

127 P.2d 415, 14 Wash. 2d 236

CourtWashington Supreme Court

DecidedJuly 10, 1942

DocketNo. 28701.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 127 P.2d 415 (McLennan v. New Light Gold Mining Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

McLennan v. New Light Gold Mining Co., 127 P.2d 415, 14 Wash. 2d 236 (Wash. 1942).

Pincite

Opinion

Blake, J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. Respondents Harry P. Kramer and Slate Creek Mining Company, a corporation, move to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable.

It has been repeatedly and consistently held that orders sustaining or overruling demurrers are not appealable. Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389, 25 Pac. 330, 12 L. R. A. 150; Olsen v. Newton, 3 Wash. 429, 30 Pac. 450; Smith v. Seattle & Montana R. Co., 6 Wash. *237 295, 32 Pac. 1073; Schutzler v. Times Pub. Co., 88 Wash. 236, 152 Pac. 1018; Le Blank v. Eller, 118 Wash. 353, 203 Pac. 960; Anderson v. East Gate Temple Ass’n, 189 Wash. 221, 64 P. (2d) 510.

Appeal dismissed.

Robinson, C. J., Beals, Steinert, and Jeffers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI