McLennan v. New Light Gold Mining Co.

127 P.2d 415, 14 Wash. 2d 236
Washington Supreme Court·Decided July 10, 1942·No. No. 28701.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Blake, J.

This is an appeal from an order sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. Respondents Harry P. Kramer and Slate Creek Mining Company, a corporation, move to dismiss the appeal on the ground that the order is not appealable.

It has been repeatedly and consistently held that orders sustaining or overruling demurrers are not appealable. Potvin v. McCorvey, 1 Wash. 389, 25 Pac. 330, 12 L. R. A. 150; Olsen v. Newton, 3 Wash. 429, 30 Pac. 450; Smith v. Seattle & Montana R. Co., 6 Wash. *237 295, 32 Pac. 1073; Schutzler v. Times Pub. Co., 88 Wash. 236, 152 Pac. 1018; Le Blank v. Eller, 118 Wash. 353, 203 Pac. 960; Anderson v. East Gate Temple Ass’n, 189 Wash. 221, 64 P. (2d) 510.

Appeal dismissed.

Robinson, C. J., Beals, Steinert, and Jeffers, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

McLennan v. New Light Gold Mining Co., 127 P.2d 415, 14 Wash. 2d 236 (Wash. 1942).

127 P.2d 415 (McLennan v. New Light Gold Mining Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Boyle v. Boyle
210 P.2d 140 (Washington Supreme Court, 1949)