Schulte v. Schulte

624 N.E.2d 1065, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1428
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedJanuary 12, 1994
Docket93-1588
StatusPublished

This text of 624 N.E.2d 1065 (Schulte v. Schulte) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schulte v. Schulte, 624 N.E.2d 1065, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1428 (Ohio 1994).

Opinion

Wood County, No. 91WD075. On motion for leave to file cross-appeal instanter. Motion granted.

Wright and P.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

On motion to dismiss cross-appeal. Motion denied.

Wright and P.E. Sweeney, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
624 N.E.2d 1065, 68 Ohio St. 3d 1428, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schulte-v-schulte-ohio-1994.