Schueck Steel, Inc. v. McCarthy Bros. Co.

717 S.W.2d 816, 711 S.W.2d 820, 289 Ark. 436, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2095
CourtSupreme Court of Arkansas
DecidedOctober 20, 1986
Docket86-96
StatusPublished
Cited by17 cases

This text of 717 S.W.2d 816 (Schueck Steel, Inc. v. McCarthy Bros. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schueck Steel, Inc. v. McCarthy Bros. Co., 717 S.W.2d 816, 711 S.W.2d 820, 289 Ark. 436, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2095 (Ark. 1986).

Opinions

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

Appellant Schueck Steel, Inc. filed suit to foreclose, a lien against appellee McCarthy Brothers Company. The trial court granted a default judgment against appellee. Later, the trial court set aside the default judgment. Appellant appeals, contending that the trial court erred in setting aside the default judgment. We dismiss the appeal because the setting aside of a default judgment is not a final judgment by the trial court. Ark. R. App. P. 2.

We have frequently held that we will not decide the merits of an appeal when the order appealed is not a final one. Fratesi v. Bond, 282 Ark. 213, 666 S.W.2d 712 (1984); Corning Bank v. Delta Rice Mills, Inc., 281 Ark. 342, 663 S.W.2d 737 (1984); Heffner v. Harrod, 278 Ark. 188, 644 S.W.2d 579 (1983); McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Zuber, 275 Ark. 345, 629 S.W.2d 304 (1982); Roberts Enterprises, Inc. v. Arkansas Highway Commission, 277 Ark. 25, 638 S.W.2d 675 (1982). In all of these cases we have stated that in order for a judgment to be appealable, it must dismiss the parties or conclude their rights to the subject matter in controversy. Here, the parties are still before the trial court, and the rights in the subject matter remain to be decided.

717 S.W.2d 816 Owens, McHaney & Calhoun, by: John C. Calhoun, Jr., for appellant. Friday, Eldredge & Clark, by: John Dewey Watson, for appellee.

The appellee does not raise the issue of appealability, but the issue is a jurisdictional one which we raise on our own in order to avoid piecemeal litigation. Hyatt v. City of Bentonville, 275 Ark. 210, 628 S.W.2d 326 (1982).

Appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Henson v. Cradduck
2017 Ark. 317 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2017)
Johnson v. State
375 S.W.3d 12 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2010)
New Holland Credit Co., LLC v. Hill
208 S.W.3d 191 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2005)
Epting v. Precision Paint & Glass, Inc.
110 S.W.3d 747 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)
Helena/West Helena Schools v. Hislip
79 S.W.3d 404 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2002)
Maddox v. City of Fort Smith
56 S.W.3d 375 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)
Sutter v. Payne
989 S.W.2d 887 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)
National Security Fire & Casualty Co. v. Barnes
984 S.W.2d 80 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1999)
Hubbard v. Shores Group, Inc.
855 S.W.2d 924 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1993)
Lamb v. JFM, INC.
842 S.W.2d 10 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1992)
Farmers & Merchant's Bank v. Deason
752 S.W.2d 777 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1988)
Cigna Insurance v. Brisson
744 S.W.2d 716 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1988)
Smith v. Arkansas State Highway Commission
728 S.W.2d 202 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 1987)
Schueck Steel, Inc. v. McCarthy Bros. Co.
717 S.W.2d 816 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1986)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
717 S.W.2d 816, 711 S.W.2d 820, 289 Ark. 436, 1986 Ark. LEXIS 2095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schueck-steel-inc-v-mccarthy-bros-co-ark-1986.