McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Zuber
This text of 629 S.W.2d 304 (McIlroy Bank & Trust v. Zuber) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Arkansas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant filed suit against appellees in the Chancery Court of Washington County on two promissory notes, secured by articles of personal property, seeking foreclosure, sale and deficiency judgment. Appellees moved to dismiss the complaint under Rule 12H (3), A. R. Civ. P., on the ground the court lacked jurisdiction. Appellant responded that it could sue in equity to foreclose its security interest. The chancellor found he lacked subject matter jurisdiction and transferred the suit to circuit court. Appellant appeals.
We do not reach the merits of this appeal as the order appealed from is not final and therefore, not appealable. See Rule 2 (a) 2, Ark. Rules of Appellate Procedure. It is well established that before a judgment is final and appealable it must dismiss the parties from the court, discharge them from their action or conclude their rights to the subject matter in controversy. An order transferring a suit from law to equity, or the reverse, is not appealable. Hyatt v. City of Bentonville, 275 Ark. 210, 628 S.W. 2d 326 (1982); Heber Springs Lawn and Garden, Inc. v. FMC Corp., 275 Ark. 260, 628 S.W. 2d 563 (1982).
Appeal dismissed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
629 S.W.2d 304, 275 Ark. 345, 1982 Ark. LEXIS 1315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/mcilroy-bank-trust-v-zuber-ark-1982.