String v. Kazi

846 S.W.2d 649, 312 Ark. 6, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 80
Supreme Court of Arkansas·Decided February 8, 1993·No. 92-826·Published·Cited by 12 cases

Opinion

Robert H. Dudley, Justice.

The plaintiff filed this suit on January 22,1992, and service of process was had on January 27, 1992. On February 19, 1992, the defendant filed an answer and counterclaim that is in the nature of a set-off. On February 21, 1992, the trial court granted a default judgment for the full amount of damages prayed. The defendant moved to have the default judgment set aside, and the plaintiff moved to strike the counterclaim. On April 17,1992, which was within ninety days of the default judgment, the trial court refused to set aside the default judgment as to liability, but did set it aside as to damages and refused to strike the counterclaim. The defendant seeks to appeal, even though the issue of damages and the counterclaim remain to be tried before there can be a final order.

We have frequently held that we will not decide the merits of an appeal when the order appealed from is not a final order. Sevenprop Assocs. v. Harrison, 295 Ark. 5, 746 S.W.2d 51 (1988); Tapp v. Fowler, 288 Ark. 70, 702 S.W.2d 17 (1986); McIlroy Bank and Trusty. Zuber, 275 Ark. 345, 629 S.W.2d 304 (1982). In each of these cases we stated that in order for a judgment to be appealable, it must dismiss the parties or conclude their rights to the subject matter in controversy.

Appeal dismissed.

Hays and Corbin, JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

String v. Kazi, 846 S.W.2d 649, 312 Ark. 6, 1993 Ark. LEXIS 80 (Ark. 1993).

846 S.W.2d 649 (String v. Kazi) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Henson v. Cradduck
2017 Ark. 317 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2017)
Reynolds v. Lindberg
2015 Ark. App. 324 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2015)
Israel v. Oskey
212 S.W.3d 45 (Court of Appeals of Arkansas, 2005)
U.S. Bank, N.A. v. Milburn
100 S.W.3d 674 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2003)
Tri-State Delta Chemicals, Inc. v. Crow
61 S.W.3d 172 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 2001)
Massongill v. County of Scott
991 S.W.2d 105 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)
Nash v. ESTATE OF SWAFFER
983 S.W.2d 942 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1999)
Jordan v. Thomas
964 S.W.2d 399 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1998)
Putman v. Sanders
878 S.W.2d 407 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1994)