School District No. 89, Stephens County v. Cox

1910 OK 359, 112 P. 1041, 27 Okla. 459, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 237
Supreme Court of Oklahoma·Decided November 16, 1910·No. 1924·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

DUNN, O. J.

This case presents error from the county court of Stephens county. August 20, 1909, there was made and entered an order denying motion of plaintiff in error for new trial, and an order made, which was subsequently extended, providing for maldng and serving a case-made within forty-five days. The case-made was not served until October 11, 1909, which was a time subsequent to the expiration of the time allowed. Counsel for defendant in error have filed a motion to dismiss the petition in error for this reason, which, under the uniform holdings of this court, must be sustained. See case of Carr v. Thompson et al. (ante) 108 Pac. 1101, and authorities therein cited, and case of McCoy v. McCoy et al., (ante), delivered at this- term of court.

The cause is accordingly dismissed.

All the Justices concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

School District No. 89, Stephens County v. Cox, 1910 OK 359, 112 P. 1041, 27 Okla. 459, 1910 Okla. LEXIS 237 (Okla. 1910).

1910 OK 359 (School District No. 89, Stephens County v. Cox) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Barger-Adams Co. v. Walker Bros.
1916 OK 197 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1916)
Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.
1913 OK 591 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Williams v. New State Bank
1913 OK 396 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1913)
Foulds v. Hubbard
1912 OK 722 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)
Heath v. Tanner
1912 OK 40 (Supreme Court of Oklahoma, 1912)