Barger-Adams Co. v. Walker Bros.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Barger-Adams Co. v. Walker Bros.

1916 OK 197, 155 P. 587, 55 Okla. 637, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 208

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedFebruary 15, 1916

Docket6733

StatusPublished

This text of 1916 OK 197 (Barger-Adams Co. v. Walker Bros.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Barger-Adams Co. v. Walker Bros., 1916 OK 197, 155 P. 587, 55 Okla. 637, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 208 (Okla. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The motion for a new trial filed by the plaintiff in error in this cause in the court below was overruled on February 16, 1914, and the plaintiff in error was given 90 days within which to' make and serve a case-made in the Supreme Court. Thereafter, on May 12, 1914, the trial judge made an order giving to the plaintiff in error 60 days from and after May 15, 1914, in which to make and serve a case-made in this action. The case-made was served on July 15, 1914. From an examination of the record it appears • that plaintiff in' error *638 had from the 15th day of May, 1914, to July 14, 1914, in which to serve its case-made, but that it permitted' the time to expire, and did not serve its case-made until, the 15th day of July, 1914, which was one day late.

Therefore this case is controlled by the decisions of' this court to the effect that a party desiring to'appeal has-three (now 15) days by statute in which to serve the case-made after the judgment or order appealed from was entered, but unless such cáse-made is served within that time- or within an extension of time allowed by the judge or trial court within said time, the case will not be considered in this court. See School District No. 80 v. Cox, 27 Okla. 459, 112 Pac. 1041, and numerous authorities to 'the-same effect.

We are therefore of the opinion that the case-made is; a nullity, and that this cause cannot be considered by this, court, and we recommend that this case be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

HOOKER, C.

The motion for a new trial filed by the plaintiff in error in this cause in the court below was overruled on February 16, 1914, and the plaintiff in error was given 90 days within which to' make and serve a case-made in the Supreme Court. Thereafter, on May 12, 1914, the trial judge made an order giving to the plaintiff in error 60 days from and after May 15, 1914, in which to make and serve a case-made in this action. The case-made was served on July 15, 1914. From an examination of the record it appears • that plaintiff in' error *638 had from the 15th day of May, 1914, to July 14, 1914, in which to serve its case-made, but that it permitted' the time to expire, and did not serve its case-made until, the 15th day of July, 1914, which was one day late.

Therefore this case is controlled by the decisions of' this court to the effect that a party desiring to'appeal has-three (now 15) days by statute in which to serve the case-made after the judgment or order appealed from was entered, but unless such cáse-made is served within that time- or within an extension of time allowed by the judge or trial court within said time, the case will not be considered in this court. See School District No. 80 v. Cox, 27 Okla. 459, 112 Pac. 1041, and numerous authorities to 'the-same effect.

We are therefore of the opinion that the case-made is; a nullity, and that this cause cannot be considered by this, court, and we recommend that this case be dismissed.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1916 OK 197, 155 P. 587, 55 Okla. 637, 1916 Okla. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/barger-adams-co-v-walker-bros-okla-1916.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack