Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.

1913 OK 591, 143 P. 46, 41 Okla. 341, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 444

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 14, 1913

Docket2919

StatusPublished

This text of 1913 OK 591 (Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Jordon v. St. Louis S. F. R. Co., 1913 OK 591, 143 P. 46, 41 Okla. 341, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 444 (Okla. 1913).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This appeal is prosecuted by-case-made. A motion for new trial was filed on December 12,. 1910. The record fails to show when this motion was acted upon. The case-made was served on opposing counsel April. 19, 1911. The record is not certified as a transcript.

The record before us failing to affirmatively show that the' case-made was served within three days after final judgment,, or within an extension of time properly allowed by the court, the same is a nullity and presents nothing for this court to review. The cause is dismissed. Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173, 92 Pac. 152; Bettis v. Cargile, 23 Okla. 301, 100 Pac. 436; Lankford v. Wallace, 26 Okla. 857, 110 Pac. 672; Carr v. Thompson, 27 Okla. 7, 110 Pac. 667; Lathim v. Schlack, 27 Okla. 522, 112 Pac. 968; Willson v. Willson, 27 Okla. 419, 112 Pac. 970; McCoy v. McCoy, 27 Okla. 371, 112 Pac. 1040; School District v. Cox, 27 Okla. 459, 112 Pac, 1041; First Nat. Bank v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank, 29 Okla. 411, 118 Pac. 574; Bettis v. Cargile, 34 Okla. 319, 126 Pac. 222.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

BREWER, C.

This appeal is prosecuted by-case-made. A motion for new trial was filed on December 12,. 1910. The record fails to show when this motion was acted upon. The case-made was served on opposing counsel April. 19, 1911. The record is not certified as a transcript.

The record before us failing to affirmatively show that the' case-made was served within three days after final judgment,, or within an extension of time properly allowed by the court, the same is a nullity and presents nothing for this court to review. The cause is dismissed. Com’rs v. Porter, 19 Okla. 173, 92 Pac. 152; Bettis v. Cargile, 23 Okla. 301, 100 Pac. 436; Lankford v. Wallace, 26 Okla. 857, 110 Pac. 672; Carr v. Thompson, 27 Okla. 7, 110 Pac. 667; Lathim v. Schlack, 27 Okla. 522, 112 Pac. 968; Willson v. Willson, 27 Okla. 419, 112 Pac. 970; McCoy v. McCoy, 27 Okla. 371, 112 Pac. 1040; School District v. Cox, 27 Okla. 459, 112 Pac, 1041; First Nat. Bank v. Oklahoma Nat. Bank, 29 Okla. 411, 118 Pac. 574; Bettis v. Cargile, 34 Okla. 319, 126 Pac. 222.

By the Court: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1913 OK 591, 143 P. 46, 41 Okla. 341, 1914 Okla. LEXIS 444, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/jordon-v-st-louis-s-f-r-co-okla-1913.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack