Schmalzried v. Findley

394 So. 2d 436, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19534
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedJanuary 13, 1981
DocketNo. 80-601
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 394 So. 2d 436 (Schmalzried v. Findley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schmalzried v. Findley, 394 So. 2d 436, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19534 (Fla. Ct. App. 1981).

Opinions

PER CURIAM.

The summary judgment entered below is reversed because the record reflects a genuine, triable issue as to whether the plaintiff-brokers earned their commission by producing a buyer ready, willing, and able to purchase on terms acceptable to the defendant-seller, and upon which he actually and specifically agreed. Hopkins v. Gibson Furniture, Inc., 312 So.2d 499 (Fla. 2d DCA 1975); Jerry Norris, Inc. v. Ackel, 311 So.2d 712 (Fla. 4th DCA 1975); Cammack v. Leonhardt, 302 So.2d 170 (Fla. 4th DCA 1974); see generally, Holl v. Talcott, 191 So.2d 40 (Fla.1966).

Reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Era Newman-Greenstein Real Estate Co. v. Kapelow
521 So. 2d 315 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1988)
MID-FLORIDA REALTY ASSOCIATES v. Truesdell
454 So. 2d 747 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1984)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
394 So. 2d 436, 1981 Fla. App. LEXIS 19534, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schmalzried-v-findley-fladistctapp-1981.