Era Newman-Greenstein Real Estate Co. v. Kapelow

521 So. 2d 315, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 622, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 894, 1988 WL 18603
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 8, 1988·No. No. 87-1584·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

We reverse the summary judgment entered in favor of Paul Kapelow and Kendall Walk Townhomes, Inc. which denied the appellants’ claim for a real estate brokerage commission. Finding that a genuine issue of material fact exists as to whether the appellants procured a buyer ready, willing, and able to purchase the property as required under the oral listing agreement with Kendall Walk Townhomes, Inc., we hold that summary judgment was improper. Schmalzried v. Findley, 394 So.2d 436 (Fla. 3d DCA), review denied, 402 So.2d 609 (Fla.1981).

Accordingly, the order granting summary judgment is affirmed in part, and reversed in part, and remanded to the trial court for proceedings consistent with our holding.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Era Newman-Greenstein Real Estate Co. v. Kapelow, 521 So. 2d 315, 13 Fla. L. Weekly 622, 1988 Fla. App. LEXIS 894, 1988 WL 18603 (Fla. Ct. App. 1988).

521 So. 2d 315 (Era Newman-Greenstein Real Estate Co. v. Kapelow) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Schmalzried v. Findley
394 So. 2d 436 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1981)