Wilder v. Zaydon

Supreme Court of Florida

Wilder v. Zaydon

330 So. 2d 133, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4420

Supreme Court of Florida·Decided March 24, 1976·No. No. 46897·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM. .

Certiorari was granted in this cause because of apparent conflict between the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 305 So.2d [134]*13481 (Fla.App.1974) and the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Block v. Drucker, 212 So.2d 890 (Fla.App. 1968).

After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ heretofore issued is discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND and HATCH-ETT, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM. .

Certiorari was granted in this cause because of apparent conflict between the instant decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, reported at 305 So.2d [134]*13481 (Fla.App.1974) and the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Third District, in Block v. Drucker, 212 So.2d 890 (Fla.App. 1968).

After hearing argument and upon further consideration of the matter, we have determined that the Court is without jurisdiction. Therefore, the Writ heretofore issued is discharged.

It is so ordered.

OVERTON, C. J., and ROBERTS, ADKINS, BOYD, ENGLAND and HATCH-ETT, JJ., concur.

Wilder v. Zaydon, 330 So. 2d 133, 1976 Fla. LEXIS 4420 (Fla. 1976).

Pincite

330 So. 2d 133 (Wilder v. Zaydon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related