Home/U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York/Schipper v. Consumer Cordage Co.

Schipper v. Consumer Cordage Co.

72 F. 803, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3302
CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York
DecidedNovember 23, 1895
StatusPublished
Cited by15 cases

This text of 72 F. 803 (Schipper v. Consumer Cordage Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Schipper v. Consumer Cordage Co., 72 F. 803, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3302 (circtsdny 1895).

Opinion

LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.

In Rycroft v. Green, 49 Fed. 177, it is stated to he the settled practice in this circuit to hold that extension of time to answer by order of court extends the time for removal. Such construction is within the language of the act of 1887, “before the defendant is required by the laws of the state or the rule of the state court * to answer.” But an extension of time to answer by stipulation only cannot he held to be an extension by rule of court. Motion to remand is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

In re Sneider
59 F.R.D. 391 (S.D. New York, 1973)
Frankson v. Carter & Weeks Stevedoring Co.
188 Misc. 599 (New York Supreme Court, 1946)
Bankers Securities Corp. v. Insurance Equities Corp.
85 F.2d 856 (Third Circuit, 1936)
Silverstein v. Ætna Life Ins.
16 F. Supp. 404 (N.D. New York, 1936)
Samuel S. Glauber, Inc. v. Lehigh Valley R.
8 F. Supp. 347 (S.D. New York, 1934)
Earle C. Anthony, Inc. v. National Broadcasting Co.
8 F. Supp. 346 (S.D. New York, 1934)
Burton v. Smith
191 N.C. 599 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1926)
Waverly Stone & Gravel Co. v. Waterloo, C. F. & N. Ry. Co.
239 F. 561 (N.D. Iowa, 1917)
Municipality of Cayey v. Ormaechea
9 P.R. Fed. 207 (D. Puerto Rico, 1916)
Pruitt v. Charlotte Power Co.
81 S.E. 624 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 1914)
Russell v. Harriman Land Co.
145 F. 745 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York, 1906)
Groton Bridge & Manufacturing Co. v. American Bridge Co.
137 F. 284 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Northern New York, 1905)
Lord v. Lehigh Val. R. Co.
104 F. 929 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York, 1900)
Mayer v. Ft. Worth & D. C. R. Co.
93 F. 601 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York, 1899)
Chiatovich v. Hanchett
78 F. 193 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nevada, 1897)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
72 F. 803, 1895 U.S. App. LEXIS 3302, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/schipper-v-consumer-cordage-co-circtsdny-1895.