Rycroft v. Green

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

Rycroft v. Green

49 F. 177, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1594

CourtU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York

DecidedFebruary 6, 1892

StatusPublished

Cited by5 cases

This text of 49 F. 177 (Rycroft v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Rycroft v. Green, 49 F. 177, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1594 (circtsdny 1892).

Pincite

Opinion

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

It is the law and practice of this circuit that an extension of time to answer by order of court, whether made on stipulation or not, extends the time for removal. This was settled practice here before the decisions in other circuits, which are referred to on the argument, and, in view of what an “extension of time to answer” is under the Code rales and practice of the courts of this state, seems conformable alike to the letter and the spirit of the removal act

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Lacombe, Circuit Judge.

It is the law and practice of this circuit that an extension of time to answer by order of court, whether made on stipulation or not, extends the time for removal. This was settled practice here before the decisions in other circuits, which are referred to on the argument, and, in view of what an “extension of time to answer” is under the Code rales and practice of the courts of this state, seems conformable alike to the letter and the spirit of the removal act

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 F. 177, 1892 U.S. App. LEXIS 1594, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/rycroft-v-green-circtsdny-1892.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack