Scales v. American Web Coders
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK WILLIAM SCALES, Plaintiff, 1:23-CV-6448 (LTS) -against- ORDER OF DISMISSAL AMERICAN WEB CODERS; SILICON GRAPHICS, Defendants. LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN, Chief United States District Judge: By order dated October 10, 2023, the Court granted Plaintiff, who appears pro se, leave to file an amended complaint within 60 days. That order specified that failure to comply would result in dismissal of this action for the reasons set forth in that order, namely, for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and as brought in the wrong venue. (See ECF 6, at 11.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint. Accordingly, the Court dismisses this action for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and as brought in the wrong venue. See 28 U.S.C. § 1406(a); Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(h)(3). The Court therefore denies Plaintiff’s application for the Court to request pro bono counsel as moot.1 (ECF 4.) The Court certifies under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. Cf. Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962) (holding that an appellant demonstrates good faith when he seeks review of a nonfrivolous issue).
1 The Court notes that, on January 10, 2024, Plaintiff also filed a letter requesting service by the United States Marshals Service. (ECF 7.) Because the Court dismisses this action, it denies that request as moot as well. The Court directs the Clerk of Court to enter a judgment dismissing this action for the reasons set forth in this order. SO ORDERED. Dated: January 12, 2024 New York, New York
/s/ Laura Taylor Swain LAURA TAYLOR SWAIN Chief United States District Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Scales v. American Web Coders (Scales v. American Web Coders) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.