Santos v. Caryall Transport

987 P.2d 1271, 163 Or. App. 414
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided October 13, 1999·No. Agency No. 96-01407 CA A99312·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

987 P.2d 1271 (1999)
163 Or. App. 414

In the Matter of the Compensation of Benjamin G. Santos, Claimant.
Benjamin G. SANTOS, Petitioner,
v.
CARYALL TRANSPORT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.

(Agency No. 96-01407; CA A99312)

Court of Appeals of Oregon.

Argued and Submitted October 27, 1998.
Decided October 13, 1999.

Merrill Schneider, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Donald M. Hooton and Schneider, Hooton.

David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.

Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge,[*] and ARMSTRONG, Judge.

PER CURIAM.

Reversed and remanded for recalculation of amount of permanent partial disability payment. Crowder v. Alumaflex, 163 Or. App. 143, 986 P.2d 1269 (1999).

NOTES

[*] Deits, C.J., vice Warren, P.J., retired.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Santos v. Caryall Transport, 987 P.2d 1271, 163 Or. App. 414 (Or. Ct. App. 1999).

987 P.2d 1271 (Santos v. Caryall Transport) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

SAIF Corp. v. Santos
94 P.3d 906 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2004)
Santos v. Caryall Transport
17 P.3d 509 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2000)