Santos v. Caryall Transport
This text of 987 P.2d 1271 (Santos v. Caryall Transport) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Compensation of Benjamin G. Santos, Claimant.
Benjamin G. SANTOS, Petitioner,
v.
CARYALL TRANSPORT and SAIF Corporation, Respondents.
Court of Appeals of Oregon.
Merrill Schneider, Portland, argued the cause for petitioner. On the brief were Donald M. Hooton and Schneider, Hooton.
David L. Runner, Salem, argued the cause and filed the brief for respondents.
Before EDMONDS, Presiding Judge, and DEITS, Chief Judge,[*] and ARMSTRONG, Judge.
PER CURIAM.
Reversed and remanded for recalculation of amount of permanent partial disability payment. Crowder v. Alumaflex, 163 Or. App. 143, 986 P.2d 1269 (1999).
NOTES
[*] Deits, C.J., vice Warren, P.J., retired.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
987 P.2d 1271, 163 Or. App. 414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/santos-v-caryall-transport-orctapp-1999.