Sandisk Corp. v. Kingston Technology Co., Inc.
This text of Sandisk Corp. v. Kingston Technology Co., Inc. (Sandisk Corp. v. Kingston Technology Co., Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
NOTE: This order is nonprecedential.
United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
SANDISK CORP., Plaintiff-Appellant,
V.
KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CO., INC. AND KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CORP., Defendants-Cross Appellants.
2012-1384, -1421
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin in case no. 10-CV-0243, Senior Judge Barbara B. Crabb.
ON MOTION
ORDER
Upon consideration of the parties’ joint motion for an extension of time for the remaining briefing in this appeaL
SANDISK CORP. V. KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY CO., INC. 2
IT Is ORDERED THAT:
The motion is granted The cross-appellants’ initial brief is due October 12, 2012. The appellant’s reply brief is due November 30, 2012; and the cross-appellants’ reply brief is due December 21, 2012.
FoR THE CoURT
SEP 1 4 2012 /s/ Jan Horbaly Date J an Horba1y Clerk cc: David M. Barkan, Esq. Raoul D. Kennedy, Esq. 325 FlLED ""“r?+%"p'§f»€§£"&§%ts»r“°“ SEP 1 4 2012 JAN HURBA|.Y CLERK
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Sandisk Corp. v. Kingston Technology Co., Inc., Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sandisk-corp-v-kingston-technology-co-inc-cafc-2012.