Sander v. JP Morgan Chase
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK wee eK MARIE SANDER, Plaintiff, -against- 22 CIVIL 1543 (VB) JUDGMENT JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A. (incorrectly sued herein as “JP MORGAN CHASE” and “JP MORGAN CHASE NA”); JAMIE DIMON (incorrectly sued herein as “JAMIE DIAMON”); MCCALLA RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE LLC (incorrectly sued herein as “MRLP McCall RAYMER LEIBERT PIERCE DDLLC”); and KYLE JACOBS, ESQ., Defendants. wenn K It is hereby ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED: That for the reasons stated in the Court's Opinion and Order dated February 9, 2023, the motion to dismiss is GRANTED. The Court certifies pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3) that any appeal from the Order would not be taken in good faith, and therefore in forma pauperis status is denied for the purpose of an appeal. See Coppedge v. United States, 369 U.S. 438, 444-45 (1962); accordingly, the case is closed. Dated: New York, New York February 10, 2023 RUBY J. KRAJICK
Clerk of Court BY: HK MNMLANGO Deputy Clerk
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sander v. JP Morgan Chase (Sander v. JP Morgan Chase) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.