Sampson v. State
794 So. 2d 611, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1166, 2001 WL 109193
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Sampson v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 832 So. 2d 251 →
Opinion
Robert Sampson appeals from the dismissal of his motion to reduce sentence pursuant to Florida Rule of Criminal Pro[612]*612cedure 3.800(c). The trial court dismissed the motion for lack of jurisdiction, and we treat this appeal as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Martin v. State, 754 So.2d 793 (Fla. 2d DCA 2000); Davis v. State, 745 So.2d 499 (Fla. 1st DCA 1999). We deny the petition because Sampson filed his motion to reduce sentence well outside the sixty-day time limit provided for in rule 3.800(c).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Sampson v. State, 794 So. 2d 611, 2001 Fla. App. LEXIS 1166, 2001 WL 109193 (Fla. Ct. App. 2001).
794 So. 2d 611 (Sampson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Davis v. State
745 So. 2d 499 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Martin v. State
754 So. 2d 793 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2000)