Sampson v. Commissioner

1983 T.C. Memo. 512, 46 T.C.M. 1182, 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 284
CourtUnited States Tax Court
DecidedAugust 22, 1983
DocketDocket No. 1000-82
StatusUnpublished

This text of 1983 T.C. Memo. 512 (Sampson v. Commissioner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering United States Tax Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sampson v. Commissioner, 1983 T.C. Memo. 512, 46 T.C.M. 1182, 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 284 (tax 1983).

Opinion

GEORGE W. SAMPSON, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent
Sampson v. Commissioner
Docket No. 1000-82
United States Tax Court
T.C. Memo 1983-512; 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 284; 46 T.C.M. (CCH) 1182; T.C.M. (RIA) 83512;
August 22, 1983.

*284 Petitioner filed Forms 1040 which contained no figures or other information with respect to his income. In the notice of deficiency respondent determined that petitioner was taxable on the amounts he admittedly received as wages.

Held: Petitioner's constitutional rights were not violated and the deficiencies determined by respondent are sustained.

Held,further: Petitioner is liable for additions to tax under sections 6651(a)(1), 6653(a), and 6654, I.R.C. 1954.

George W. Sampson, pro se.
Robert M. Hallmark, for the respondent.

DRENNEN

MEMORANDUM FINDINGS OF FACT AND OPINION

DRENNEN, Judge: Respondent determined the following deficiencies and additions to tax in petitioner's Federal income tax:

Additions to Tax 1
YearDeficiencySec. 6651(a)(1)Sec. 6653(a)Sec. 6654
1978$8,093.09$1,839.05$404.65$229.50
1979$11,990.12$2,414.99$599.51$379.66
1980$ 8,956.99$2,188.31$447.85$555.55

The issues for decision are (1) whether various constitutional rights of petitioner have been violated, and (2) whether petitioner is liable for certain additions to tax.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Some of the facts have been stipulated and are found accordingly. The stipulation of facts and attached exhibits are incorporated herein by reference.

*286 Petitioner George W. Sampson resided in Walcott, Wyoming on the date the petition was filed. Petitioner filed with the Internal Revenue Service a Form 1040 for each of the taxable years 1978, 1979, and 1980.

The Forms 1040 filed by petitioner for each of the taxable years in issue contained single asterisks in each of the spaces in which an income or other figure was to be reported. The single asterisks referred to petitioner's constitutional objections to having to provide the requested information.

During the taxable years 1978, 1979, and 1980, petitioner received wages from employers of $26,546.17, $34,983.55, and $29,199.97, respectively. Respondent determined a deficiency in petitioner's Federal income tax for 1978, 1979, and 1980, based on petitioner's failure to report any of his wages for these years as taxable income. In addition, respondent determined that petitioner was liable for various additions to tax.

OPINION

The first issue is whether various constitutional rights of petitioner have been violated. Petitioner contends that the requirement that he complete and file a valid Federal income tax return violates his Fourth Amendment rights against unreasonable*287 search and seizure and his Fifth Amendment rights against self-incrimination. Petitioner further contends that the notice of deficiency "was issued without due process." We disagree.

Each of petitioner's constitutional arguments have been repeatedly rejected by this and other Courts. See White v. Commissioner,72 T.C. 1126 (1979); Cupp v. Commissioner,65 T.C. 68 (1975). affd. by unpublished order 559 F.2d 1207 (3rd Cir. 1977), and we likewise reject them. 1

The second issue is whether petitioner is liable for various additions to tax. Petitioner has the burden of proving that he is not liable for the various additions to tax. Welch v. Helvering,290 U.S. 11, 115 (1933).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Minnesota v. Blasius
290 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1933)
United States v. Arthur J. Porth
426 F.2d 519 (Tenth Circuit, 1970)
Cupp v. Commissioner
65 T.C. 68 (U.S. Tax Court, 1975)
Hatfield v. Commissioner
68 T.C. 895 (U.S. Tax Court, 1977)
White v. Commissioner
72 T.C. 1126 (U.S. Tax Court, 1979)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
1983 T.C. Memo. 512, 46 T.C.M. 1182, 1983 Tax Ct. Memo LEXIS 284, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sampson-v-commissioner-tax-1983.