Sammons v. State

122 So. 309, 23 Ala. App. 162, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 140
CourtAlabama Court of Appeals
DecidedMay 7, 1929
Docket5 Div. 735.
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 122 So. 309 (Sammons v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Alabama Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Sammons v. State, 122 So. 309, 23 Ala. App. 162, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 140 (Ala. Ct. App. 1929).

Opinion

BRICKEN, P. J.

This appellant interposed a plea of guilty in the court below upon his arraignment for the offense of violating the prohibition law. His plea was accepted, and judgment of conviction accordingly entered. Notwithstanding his plea of guilty, he appealed from the judgment of conviction to this court. This he had the right to do. Wright v. City of Bessemer, 209 Ala. 374, 96 So. 316.

The appeal here is rested upon the record proper; there being no bill of exceptions nor other effort to show error. This appeal was manifestly for delay. ■ The judgment of conviction from which the appeal was taken will stand affirmed, as the record appears regular in all things.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Peever v. City Com'rs of Florence
155 So. 887 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1934)
Reed v. State
152 So. 745 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1934)
Puckett v. State
133 So. 63 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1931)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
122 So. 309, 23 Ala. App. 162, 1929 Ala. App. LEXIS 140, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/sammons-v-state-alactapp-1929.