Reed v. State

152 So. 745, 26 Ala. App. 64, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 15
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Reed v. State. Read the opinion of the Court — 25 Ala. App. 18
Alabama Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 1934·No. 8 Div. 916.·Published

Opinion

BRICKEN, Presiding Judge.

The indictment in this case charged this appellant, and another, with the offense of grand larceny, in that they feloniously took and carried away about 1,620 feet of galvanized pipe, of the value of, to wit, $202.50, the personal property of Claude King & Son, Inc., a corporation, etc. It was returned into open court by the grand jury and filed on the 8th day of February, 1932. On May 22, 1933, this appellant appeared, and in answer to the indictment interposed a plea of guilty to petit larceny, judgment of conviction was duly pronounced and entered, the court having fixed a fine of $25, to which was added six months’ hard labor for the county. Notwithstanding the fact that the accused pleaded guilty, as stated, he took an appeal from the judgment of conviction to this court.

A plea of guilty, though voluntary, does not preclude the defendant from taking an appeal. Sammons v. State, 23 Ala. App. 162, 122 So. 309. Hence this appeal will not be dismissed for that reason.

However, the judgment of conviction in the court below must be, and is, affirmed for the reason the record upon which this appeal is rested is regular in all things.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reed v. State, 152 So. 745, 26 Ala. App. 64, 1934 Ala. App. LEXIS 15 (Ala. Ct. App. 1934).

152 So. 745 (Reed v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sammons v. State
122 So. 309 (Alabama Court of Appeals, 1929)