Saiya v. State

Supreme Court of Florida

Saiya v. State

654 So. 2d 128, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 227, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 685, 1995 WL 256222

CourtSupreme Court of Florida

DecidedMay 4, 1995

DocketNo. 84412

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 654 So. 2d 128 (Saiya v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Saiya v. State, 654 So. 2d 128, 20 Fla. L. Weekly Supp. 227, 1995 Fla. LEXIS 685, 1995 WL 256222 (Fla. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

SHAW, Justice.

We have for review Saiya v. State, 641 So.2d 975 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994), wherein the district court rejected a constitutional challenge to the validity of section 784.048(4), Florida Statutes (1993), Florida’s anti-stalking statute, based on several cases including Bouters v. State, 634 So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994). We granted review because Bouters was pending before this Court. We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.

We have since issued a decision in Bouters upholding the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, — So .2d — [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995).

Accordingly, we approve Saiya.

It is so ordered.

GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, KOGAN, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI