Folsom v. State
This text of 654 So. 2d 128 (Folsom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Colin FOLSOM, Petitioner,
v.
STATE of Florida, Respondent.
Supreme Court of Florida.
Bennett H. Brummer, Public Defender and Manuel Alvarez, Asst. Public Defender, Eleventh Judicial Circuit, Miami, for petitioner.
Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Michael J. Neimand, Asst. Atty. Gen. and Parker D. Thomson and Carol A. Licko, Sp. Asst. Attys. Gen., Miami, for respondent.
*129 SHAW, Judge.
We have for review Folsom v. State, 638 So.2d 591 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994), wherein the district court relied on Bouters v. State, 634 So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), to uphold the constitutionality of Florida's anti-stalking statute, section 784.048, Florida Statutes (1993). We have jurisdiction. Art. V, § 3(b)(3), Fla. Const.
We have recently upheld the constitutionality of the anti-stalking statute. See Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995). Accordingly, we approve Folsom on this issue.
It is so ordered.
GRIMES, C.J., and OVERTON, HARDING, WELLS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.
KOGAN, J., concurs specially with an opinion.
KOGAN, Judge, specially concurring.
With the exception of the reservations that I stated in Bouters v. State, No. 83,558, ___ So.2d ___ [1995 WL 242403] (Fla. Apr. 27, 1995), (Kogan, J., specially concurring), I concur with majority.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
654 So. 2d 128, 1995 WL 256225, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/folsom-v-state-fla-1995.