Saiya v. State

641 So. 2d 975, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8839, 1994 WL 486582
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided September 9, 1994·No. No. 93-2690·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See State v. Kahles, No. 93-0957, 1994 WL 457135 (Fla. 4th DCA August 24, 1994); Blount v. State, 641 So.2d 200 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Kostenski v. State, 641 So.2d 199 (Fla. 4th DCA 1994); Pallas v. State, 636 So.2d 1358 (Fla. 3d DCA 1994); Bouters v. State, 634 So.2d 246 (Fla. 5th DCA 1994), review granted, No. 83,558, 640 So.2d 1106 (Fla. June 21, 1994).

WARNER, POLEN and FARMER, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Saiya v. State, 641 So. 2d 975, 1994 Fla. App. LEXIS 8839, 1994 WL 486582 (Fla. Ct. App. 1994).

641 So. 2d 975 (Saiya v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Saiya v. State
654 So. 2d 128 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1995)